Close

Congress has no authority to confer statehood on the District of Columbia

By Publius Huldah

Under Article IV, Sec. 3, US Constitution, Congress has the power to admit new States into the Union.

For a list of States and when admitted, see this wiki list.

Note that the new States were “colonies” or “territories” – or as with Vermont and Texas, “independent Republics” – before they were admitted into the Union as “States”.  That is highly significant.

The District of Columbia has an existing constitutional status as “the Seat of the Government of the United States” – see Article I, Section 8, next to last clause, US Constitution.

In order to change the constitutional status of the District of Columbia from the “seat of government of the United States” to a “State”, Article I, Section 8, next to last clause, must be amended pursuant to Article V, U.S. Constitution.

Any pretended Act of Congress which purports to confer statehood on the District of Columbia would be totally and blatantly unconstitutional.

4 Comments on “Congress has no authority to confer statehood on the District of Columbia

  • […] of the treaty making power authorized in The Constitution.  For example, Art I, § 8, cl. 8, authorizes Congress “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and […]

  • […] including in areas of intimate concern to the States, the Constitution has never been understood to confer upon Congress the ability to require the States to govern according to Congress’ […]

  • […] pretended Act of Congress which purports to confer statehood on the District of Columbia would be totally and blatantly […]

  • […] Congress doesn’t have the constitutional authority to pass a national quarantine law, the president certainly doesn’t have the power to declare one […]

  • Comments are closed.